Husqvarna vs Robomow:It gets a bit more interesting when I stack two heavyweight robotic mowers on the ground, which together have over 37 years of experience in making robotic mowers and two of their most popular prodigies.
Let talk a little about these two companies …
Robomow (also known as Friendly Robotics): Robomow was founded in 1995, originally called ‘Friendly Machines’, by Udi Pedless and Shai Abramson in Israel.
Udi is quoted as saying: “We had the goal of building robots that move in and around the house and carry out the everyday tasks that people do not want to do anymore.”
Since the launch of the first Robomow in 1998, the company has seen great success and is now distributing it in the United States, Europe, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa.
Husqvarna Group: believe it or not, Husqvarna was actually founded in 1689 and has produced rifles and shotguns for more than 300 years.
Husqvarna produced sewing machines, motorcycles and chainsaws during the company’s existence.
In 1995 Husqvarna released the world’s first solar-powered robot vacuum cleaner, it was 15 years ago that the Swedish heavyweight achieved success in the sale of its robotic mowers.
Table of Content
- 1 Robomow RS630 vs Husqvarna Automower 220 AC
- 2 Husqvarna vs Robomow-My Final Verdict
Naturally,the Husqvarna 220 AC and the Robomow RS630 are both aesthetically pleasing objects. The Robomow RS630 reflects a fairly common robotic mower with a robust design and the Husqvarna 220AC has a slim European design that is usually not less than ‘the European car of robotic mowers’.
When comparing designs, I always focus on what really matters that is the functionality. A robot looks sleek and stylish, but does it really function? Let’s see.
Robomow RS630: Just like the Husqvarna, the Robomow has two main wheels usually located at the back of the robot, with two steel having main blades at the bottom of the robotic lawnmower.
The Robomow has a strong enough protection to prevent obstacles getting stuck in the blades, with the floating deck so that it can mow over the lawn seamlessly.
Cons of Robomow (Husqvarna vs Robomow)
One of the biggest drawbacks of the Robomow RS630 is its weight, the Robomow weighs as much as 715.5 oz, while the Husqvarna weighs less than half, weighing 317.4 oz.
You may not see it as a problem, but it is known that the extra weight of the Robomow causes uneven mowing as compared to the Husqvarna.
The Robomow materials used for the operation seems to be cheaper than the Husqvarna when compared side by side,as the Robmow appears more hardy and industrial.
Husqvarna’s main bonus is its weight and dimensions, the Husqvarna is 30 cm high, 0.5 cm shorter than the Robomow and is 54.9 cm wide in contrast to the Robomows which is about 66.0 cm wide. It is also less than half the weight of the Robomow. Checkout the Price Listings of Husqvarna Here!
Because the Husqvarna has smaller dimensions, this means that the cutting width is smaller, about 8 inches, which is considerably smaller than the cutting width of the Robomow at 22 inches.
Cons of Husqvarna(Husqvarna vs Robomow)
One of the biggest disadvantages of the Husqvarna is the limited cutting height settings, the Husqvarna can only cut between 0.8 inches and 2.4 inches, while the Robomow can cut from 0.8 inches to 3.1 inches.
Which one is the Winner? It has a very close call when it comes to design, both robotic mowers have simple interfaces that are easy to use, are equipped with advanced safety functions and are cut with heavy steel blades.
The Robomow takes the crown when it comes to design functionality.Although the Robomow RS630 seems to be hardy and thicker in appearance than the Husqvarna, it also has a bigger cutting width,the floating cutting deck and extra length characteristics. This is another One point for Robomow.
Performance and functions:I have covered some of the most important design features that have separated the Robomow and the Husqvarna, now I want to go deeper into the performance and characteristics of the two, because there seem to be some important distinctive differences between the two.
Robomow RS630: the Robomow RS630 not only has a larger cutting width than the Husqvarna, it can also cover a considerably larger surface than the Husqvarna 200 AC.
Again,the Robomow is designed for lawns up to 32,000 square feet while the Husqvarna can only cover lawns up to 19,000 square feet.
- The Robomow is designed for lawns up to 32,000 square feet while the Husqvarna can only cover lawns up to 19,000 square feet.
- The Robomow RS630 also comes with dedicated edge handling mode that allows the Robomow to mow all edges.
If you have a robotic lawnmower, such as the Husqvarna, which does not have the special edge machining mode, you have to cut by yourself along the edges with a whip cutter, which only adds more work.
Another important bonus of the Robomow is that it is mulchs when it reaches its terminals, so your lawn is cut and tidy, unlike the Husqvarna which has no mulching capacity.
Husqvarna 220AC:In case you have a sloppy backyard,then this one particular will be great for you. Husqvarna has a superior slope of more than 19 degrees, while the slope of the slope of the Robomow is only 18 degrees.
Unlike the Robomow RS630, the Husqvarna has an ‘automatic resume’ setting so that you can almost forget it after setting up the Husvarna.
The Robomow also has a schedule, but it must be asked to continue.
The Husqvarna is considerably more quiet than the Robomow, which is great if you run your robotic lawnmower all night long. The Husqvarna operates at 62 dB while the Robomow reaches 68 dB.
Which one is the Winner? It is really too difficult to say which one provides the best performance and features. Although Robomow does have the ability to mow larger spaces and edges, this does not necessarily have to be attractive to everyone.
The Husqvarna brings a number of fairly serious competition to the table in terms of functions, with automatic continuing with mowing, increased gradient and a generally more quiet operation. One point for each.
Charging / Battery life
It is not something that you necessarily think about when buying a robotic lawnmower, but it is a serious consideration when it comes to energy consumption and the size of your garden.
Robomow RS630: the Robomow needs 2 hours to recharge and gets 1.5 hours of mowing time from its load. The Robomow is equipped with a 26V battery.
Husqvarna:the Husqvarna takes about 90mins to move and mow which is about 45 minutes each time taking for moving and mowing from its load. Husqvarna is equipped with a much smaller voltage of about, 18V battery.
Which one is the Winner? The Robomow takes more than twice the time to recharge its 26V battery with a lot of power than the Husqvarna, and only gets twice as much mowing time.For Efficiency, power consumption and environmentally friendly, the Husqvarna takes the crown. One point for Husqvarna.
Robomow: 2 – Husqvarna: 2 (Husqvarna vs Robomow)
These robot vacuum cleaners are not your everyday $ 150 hand-operated lawn mowers, these are top-of-the-art robotic mowers and the prices reflect the technology and engineering they have undergone.
With the Robomow RS630 you pay $2,499.00 (check this offer for the latest live prices) and the Husqvarna will bring you back $1,449.95 (check this offer for the latest live prices) – there’s a price difference of $ 1049.05 and Husqvarna wins on this front. One point for Husqvarna.
Very simple: the Robomow RS630 is a better robotic mower compared to the Husqvarna 220 AC. The Robomow RS630 offers more value for money when it comes to functionality and functions.My rating is Robomow: 3 – Husqvarna: 2 Do you have experience with one of these devices? comment below!!